<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Argyris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psybertron.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psybertron.org/?p=646</link>
	<description>What, Why &#038; How do we Know ?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:29:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psybertron Asks &#187; Anomalous Energy</title>
		<link>http://www.psybertron.org/?p=646&#038;cpage=1#comment-10649</link>
		<dc:creator>Psybertron Asks &#187; Anomalous Energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psybertron.org/?p=646#comment-10649</guid>
		<description>[...] Which brings us to J.S.Mill again. Claiming to believe in the contingency of scientific knowledge is one thing. Acting that way is another. Which of course is back full circle to Chris Argyris too &#8230; the behavioural distinction (in social organisations) between &#8220;espoused theories&#8221; and &#8220;theories in use&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Which brings us to J.S.Mill again. Claiming to believe in the contingency of scientific knowledge is one thing. Acting that way is another. Which of course is back full circle to Chris Argyris too &#8230; the behavioural distinction (in social organisations) between &#8220;espoused theories&#8221; and &#8220;theories in use&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
