A full hour and wide-ranging … from David’s roots in the Woodstock of Consciousness, via the “hard problem”, free will, pure (non-objective) concsiousness, blurring the scienceÂ / philosophy boundary, to rational mysticism and peyote and LSD inducedÂ states of mind, and modern research into psychedelics.
Interesting to see David downplay “the hard problem” as justÂ his statement of the obvious that, when it comes to consciousness, any theory which ignores explanation of the subjective experience of it would seem to miss the point. He sees many physionomic approaches as doomed to making progress on the behavioural aspects (the easy problem) only. It seems he too sees a lot of mileage in the “fundamental information” angle providing not just the basis for the physical aspects, but also the phenomenal aspects. Excellent.
John loses his way a little bit on the nihilistic downside of the “illusory reality” worldview, but DavidÂ reminds usÂ illusion or not, reality is reality – like life and consciousness too. A point I’ve made before. Illusion means it may not be what we believe it is, it doesn’t mean it’s not real.
Interesting that John found David’s work refreshing and intelligible compared to others in the fieldÂ – I have to say hearing him talk I would agree – but I also have to say I found his book “The Conscious Mind” deeply technical and jargon-laden on many issues – like “supervenience”.