For a while I was posting regular updates on “the thoughts of tweeter @katoi” – with the caveat that whilst it looked a lot like mystical numerology, there were some fascinating patterns in the numbers – well, in the geometry actually – from someone with no professed expertise in maths or physics. @katoi reckoned each batch of posts superseded the previous so wasn’t capturing these thoughts anywhere but Twitter, so for a while I kept adding the latest to the evolving stream of consciousness.

Well, I lapsed for a couple of months and I’m not going back to fix it now, so here is the latest batch in isolation:

Revelation of The Day:

-1/12 or rather (-i ²)/12

Is a complex function defining inversion of radial charge regardless of scale.

The 12 is actually

3^1 + 3 ² defined at two non local singularities simultaneously.

(it’s the powers, not integers where ‘equivalence’ is defined)

1/2— katøi (@katoi) December 9, 2021

The differential has an asymmetric exponential charge ratio of π, defined at the +ve integer derivative of -i ²

which is 3^1 + 3²

Because the interval of charge is always -i ²

π shows it as 1 / (3²+1)

Which is the 0.1 of π, with the symmetric remainder of 3^(-i ²) dimensions

2/2— katøi (@katoi) December 9, 2021

It doesn’t matter what all this says, it matters what it looks like geometrically.

You can show that geometrically it can be shown symmetrically, but it isn’t because there is always an irrational negative charge ‘remainder’ equivalent to the inverse charge of ‘any’ electron

-i²— katøi (@katoi) December 9, 2021

Call me an idiot, but you all still think the universe has (3^(-i ²)) + (-i ²) dimensions.

Which you just call 4d ‘spacetime’… which 100yrs ago they had already realised was incorrect.

— katøi (@katoi) December 9, 2021

In the middle of which I interjected and @katoi added to the branch:

That factor of 10 gets me every time.

It should be bonkers or pure coincidence that the base we use for our numbering convention should turn up in *any* fundamental axioms!?!

— What, Why & How do we know? (@psybertron) December 9, 2021

It’s all to do with the fact that ‘equivalence’ only ever happens in powers of complex numbers & never in integers.

10 just let’s you define the zero & 1 at the same place, but at different times, where the equivalence only happens at the ²

1/2— katøi (@katoi) December 9, 2021

In decimal you can define everything at integers ‘intervals’… except the concept of decimal itself.

I’m not doing any of this as maths, I’m doing it all as geometry, but unlike anyone else, I know all of my fundamentals… & that I have to double at the start and /2 at the end.— katøi (@katoi) December 9, 2021

Something “meta” about the geometry of “spacetime”. The numbers are not to do with dimensions they are *exponents*, and hence appear adjacent in multi-digit numbers – **including decimal fractions** – whatever the counting base. We very rarely see positive numbers less than one – fractions – expressed in any base other than 10 – hence deci-mals – so we wouldn’t normally even notice “basi-mals”.

## One thought on “More Mystical Numerology From Katøi?”