Posted verbatim from Laurie Taylor’s Thinking Allowed newsletter …
Welcome to the Thinking Allowed Newsletter â€” Doctor Dyt and Wittgenstein
Wednesday 17 December 2008 – http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/factual/thinkingallowed/
Repeat Sunday 21 December 2008
I had a university tutor in psychology who was popularly known as Doctor Dit.Â For a couple of terms I assumed along with my fellow students that this was an innocent nickname.Â But then one day I was told by a postgraduate that it was really an acronym.Â It was not DIT but DYT and the letters stood for Define Your Terms.
It was a very appropriate designation.Â Whereas other tutors would positively encourage some debate in their seminars, the man known as DYT would immediately bring any such discussion to a halt by a demand for definitions.Â It was not unlike being repeatedly hit over the head â€˜Right.Â Taylor, what is value of optical illusions in the study of perception?â€™ â€˜Well,â€™ one would begin, â€˜When your eyes are deceived it could be that the deception is the inappropriate applicationâ€¦â€™ â€˜Not so fast, Taylor.Â You said â€˜deception?â€™ â€˜Thatâ€™s rightâ€™ â€˜Define your terms.Â Define your terms.â€™
Over coffee in the basement canteen weâ€™d wonder about the nature of Dytâ€™s home life.Â Weâ€™d construct scenarios in which Mrs Dyt turned to him over breakfast coffee one morning and announced her dissatisfaction with the sexual side of their marriage.Â â€˜We donâ€™t make love any more.â€™Â That would really get Dyt going.Â â€˜Make love?Â Make love?Â Define your terms.Â Define your terms.â€™
Now that I look back on my time with Doctor Dyt, I feel more sympathetic to his intellectual crusade.Â What he wanted to do was purge the world of all ambiguity and ambivalences.Â He envisaged a time when people only used terms with precise definitions, a time when every flower in his intellectual garden would be precisely labelled.
Only when we reached that happy state, when the undergrowth of uncertainty had been cleared away, would we be able to arrive at hard and fast truths about the world.
But, of course, Dr Dytâ€™s enterprise was doomed to failure.Â Words simply wonâ€™t sit still and have precise definitions hung around their necks.Â Their meaning slips and slides: it is determined as Wittgenstein maintained by their many uses:
“Think of the tools in a toolbox: there is a hammer, pliers, a saw, a screwdriver, a rule, a glue-pot, glue, nails and screws.Â The functions of words are as diverse as the functions of these objects.Â (And in both cases there are similarities.)Â Of course, what confuses us is the uniform appearance of words when we hear them spoken or meet them in script or print.Â For their application is not presented to us so clearly.”
Iâ€™ve plucked that quotation from the introduction to Key Concepts in Education, a new book by Fred Inglis and Lesley Aers which doesnâ€™t so much offer clear-cut definitions of such familiar educational terms as Assessment, Citizenship, Curriculum, Literacy and Pedagogy, as show how such terms have been variously used by people with different material and philosophical interests.Â Dr Dyt would not have approved.
Join me and Fred Inglis at four oâ€™clock today or after the midnight news on Sunday or on our readily down-loadable podcast.
Also in todayâ€™s programme. Why the Chinese economic miracle may already be a thing of the past.
NB:Key Concepts in Education by Fred Inglis & Lesley Aers (Sage Publications Ltd â€” ISBN 9781412903158)