“TERF War” Culmination?

Reaction to the recent bullying of philosopher Kathleen Stock at Sussex Uni has maybe brought this awful “war” to a head? A “TERF War” as a symptom of wider culture wars, cancel culture and woke identity politics in general.

As someone with no direct skin in the games of Feminism and LGBplus rights it has always been a question of would-be rational (progressive) discourse being disfigured by ideology vs freedom of expression as a human right (for short) and the fact that what we (really) mean by free speech is incredibly complex and problematic. (How long have you got? – no amount of “rules” can avoid being gamed by those acting in bad faith, so good faith respect for the point of having rules is infinitely more important than the objective detail of any rules.)

In the “TERF War” my instinct is and always has been to defend the women (and lesbians and gays and minors) on the receiving end of the ideological bigotry, the lack of care and the downright targeted threats and violence. (Ref – dozens of my posts here and hundreds if not thousands on social media). The woke word-salad beyond women and LGB has become convenient cover – in  many cases probably ignorant cover – for misunderstanding the care and good faith aspect of freedoms. Simply adding the crass “be nice” rule cannot fix this.)

Several things happened in the last two days whilst the Sussex Uni management and the UCU traded public statements “condemning recent events” (a euphemism for  each side’s take on the bullying of Kathleen Stock).

One, a statement of solidarity from philosophy academia in support for the defence of basic freedoms, independent of any specifics of Stock’s beliefs or statements or even the topic in contention – “Trans”. (The original list here.) Significant not for the numbers – though it is now growing fast – but for the sheer range of philosophical and political positions of the many signatories.

Two, a piece by Matthew d’Ancona in Tortoise, being quoted by many:

“Why do all conversations always end up being about trans?”

“If you think this [TERF War] is being fought on a level-playing field, you haven’t been paying attention.”

“The truth is the trans debate is unavoidable because it is really a crossroads, and one that leads in all directions in our culture: to freedom, censorship, identity, truth, scientific reality and Orwell’s “secret doctrine”.

And more generally:

“Defeating this cult is the intellectual and political calling of our age.”
– Denis Kavanagh

“The ‘TERF wars’ are only marginally about trans issues.”
– Mark Hammond

Trans-gender rights being “used as an excuse” in a Letter to The Times from the “trans community”. Something has changed with wider recognition of what this “war” is really about, with what is at stake. In my own recurring words:

“What passes for rational public discourse,
our very rationality as individuals, is at stake.”

—– —–

[Hat tips to many feminist, gay/lesbian and trans friends on social media. @Katoi @Jebadoo2 and many more. And acknowledgement to @Glinner who took the first hit in the early days of this “war”.]

And hot off the press – maybe Stonewall’s disgraceful role in this whole debacle is about to become clear:

One thought on ““TERF War” Culmination?”

  1. The homeopathy analogy mentioned in one of the FB responses is not a bad one. Ideologies tend to have absurd beliefs at their core. At least, they appear absurd from the outside. From the inside, or course, they are revelations. Supporters of homeopathy are unified by a belief in a core absurdity that defies both science and common sense. Similarly the core TWAW claim is absurd. Absurd enough even for many trans people to reject it.

    But the absurdity is the point. As Bertrand Russell somewhere notes, no cult was ever formed around the belief that 2+2=4. 2+2=5, however, is a different matter. Having sacrificed reason (Kierkegaard called this the offence against reason) to assert it and join the in-group, honest engagement with others is difficult. The true believers simply cannot back down without admitting that they have made a ghastly error. Hence the absolute inability of reasoned argument to gain any purchase. Every attempt at dialogue is viewed as an existential threat, hence the weird exaggerations and hyperbole, etc. Not to mention the sheer bad faith.

    In the end, trans isn’t the issue, if it ever really was. Although I reject the metaphor, it comes down to becoming entrenched on one side of the so-called ‘culture war’. Even if initially motivated by good intentions, it becomes less about what might be true and more about what ground cannot be lost, and so shutting down dialogue, poisoning the wells, and hounding the heretics (and I have every sympathy for Kathleen Stock here). Which is why it has come to this sorry state.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.