Interesting looking back on Hans Blix words around the time of the Iraq WMD inspections on how it is hard (and political) to know how to apply the “benefit of the doubt” in forensic cases like the Syrian chemical weapons “attack”. I have no doubt chemical weapons were detonated near Syrian civilians . How come? – I’m really not sure, and as Blix also says, “intent is part of knowledge”.
One thought on “Benefit of the Doubt”